1. An Open Letter To The Red Squiggles Under “Imput”

    image

    Dear Red Squiggles,

    I understand why you correct me when I try to spell the opposite of “output” as “imput”.

    I understand but I object.

    I know that this word comes from in + put, but you see, English has a grand and noble tradition of changing n to m in front of p, because both m and p are pronounced with the lips, while n is said with the tongue.

    Indeed, countless other English words have been persuaded by the sleek economy of producing with a single mouth-gesture the two sounds mp instead of the clumsy double-speak of np.

    Think imp and amp and ump, sympathy and empathy, important and impatient and imperial.

    Why should input be the only exception to this elegant pattern?

    In fact, the n is already losing. I defy anyone to say input five times fast and not end up saying imput instead.

    Input imput imput imput imput. 

    Red Squiggles, I don’t want it to be completely over between us. I still want you under other words in my life. I want to keep you under “aslo” and “becasue” and “recieve” and “theyre” and “i’ts”. And many others.

    But not imput. 

    It’s time for writing to catch up to speech. It’s time for us as a society to embrace the spelling that has hitherto been the practice of merely a bold few. It’s time to stop pretending that imput is a typo, when it is in fact logically superior. 

    The collective usage of speakers determines the norms of a language. So if enough people start writing imput it will get added to the dictionaries and yes, even spellcheck. 

    Red Squiggles Under Imput, this is war. 

     
    1. funnygeekpics reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    2. attila-the-pun reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    3. iamsomanythings reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    4. jenniferfitzswimmons reblogged this from dissimilate
    5. dissimilate reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    6. waitingforturnips reblogged this from allthingslinguistic and added:
      yesssss I also think one word spellings of ‘a lot’ and ‘in depth’ (and a few other two-word combos) should be...
    7. cylinderchameleon reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    8. purplealiceinwonderland reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    9. subtlybrilliant reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    10. lindseykayhoward reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    11. michaelblume reblogged this from shlevy
    12. clumsyglottologist reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    13. shlevy reblogged this from floopisamadman
    14. soexcuseuswhilewesingtothesky reblogged this from allthingslinguistic and added:
      No but really
    15. naradeer reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    16. linguisticky said: You are amazing.
    17. thinkingingallifreyan reblogged this from animate-mush and added:
      Awesome! Obviously I need to check out Sanskrit! See if I have any other peculiarities in common with their sound...
    18. animate-mush reblogged this from thinkingingallifreyan and added:
      Cool! and…that is odd! Maybe you’re hardwired for Sanskrit. They’ve got a d~l thing (which is still very much not an...
    19. floopisamadman reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    20. vynessia reblogged this from allthingslinguistic
    21. amorilinguae reblogged this from allthingslinguistic and added:
      Thank you! I was just thinking this.